Writing
Website vs paid lead platforms — what does a lead really cost?
Three mainstream platforms, three different ways of charging, one question underneath all of them: are you buying jobs or buying chances?
Lead sources23 August 20268 min read
Short answer: platform fees buy you access to an enquiry, not the job. The mainstream platforms charge either a recurring membership or per customer contact, several firms see the same enquiry, and your real cost is the fee divided by jobs actually won. A website inverts that — nothing arrives quickly at first, but every enquiry is yours alone and there is no per-enquiry meter running.
How each platform charges
A common pattern, told in one pass: a roofer buys credits to quote on a Rated People job — by the time his quote is in, the homeowner has four others and has stopped answering. The same week, a MyBuilder shortlist fee lands for an enquiry that turns out to be a mate doing it cheap. Neither platform scammed anybody; the model simply charges for the chance. That is the shape to understand before comparing anything.
| Platform | Reported charging model (2026) | Who else sees the enquiry | What stops when you stop paying |
|---|---|---|---|
| Checkatrade | Recurring membership, quoted per trade and area; some members also report per-contact charges — confirm at quote stage | Often several members — customers are invited to compare quotes | Profile, reviews, visibility |
| Rated People | Pay to quote on posted jobs (credits) | Other members quoting the same job | Access to new job postings |
| MyBuilder | Pay per customer who shortlists you | Whoever else the customer shortlists | Shortlist access |
The models differ, but they share a shape: money goes out for access to a chance. None of them charges only when you win.
The number that actually matters
Forget cost per lead. Work out cost per job won: everything you paid the platform over three months, divided by the number of jobs from it that you were actually hired for.
An illustrative example, and only illustrative: suppose a membership runs £120 a month and brings ten enquiries a month, of which you win two. That is £360 for three months against six won jobs — £60 a job before you have priced any labour. If the same £360 bought four won jobs from better-qualified enquiries, the “more expensive” channel would be the cheap one. Your own figures replace every number in that paragraph, which is rather the point: most firms have never written theirs down.
What a website costs by comparison
A built website front-loads its spend. Our own published prices run from £700 for a five-page sole-trader build plus a care plan from £65 a month — published in full here, so the comparison can be made honestly rather than against a guess. After the build, there is no per-enquiry charge of any kind: the fiftieth enquiry costs what the first did.
The trade-off must be stated as plainly as the platforms’ is: a new domain takes time to earn search visibility, so a website rarely produces enquiries in its first weeks the way a directory profile does. Platforms are faster out of the gate; ownership compounds instead. Both statements are true at once.
Different enquiries, not just different prices
- A platform enquiry arrived because the customer contacted several firms. Price discipline and reply speed decide it.
- An owned-channel enquiry arrived after the customer read your pages, saw your photographs and chose to contact you specifically. Those callers argue less about price and more often become repeat work — not because websites magic up loyalty, but because self-selection happens before the phone rings.
Choose each when
- Platforms suit: new firms building a first reputation, gaps that need filling this month, trades where the platform has deep local customer traffic — ask the rep for your postcode’s numbers rather than guessing — and firms disciplined enough to track won jobs against fees.
- A website suits: every established firm that wants enquiries nobody else received, wants to stop renting its position, and can give the owned channel a few months to start pulling.
- Both together suit: most firms in between — platform for now, ownership compounding underneath, with an honest review each quarter of which is earning its keep.
Where to go next
The single-platform decision gets its own treatment in is Checkatrade worth it. The free half of the owned channel — and exactly where it stops — is in Google Business Profile vs a website. What sits behind our own build prices is explained in what a tradesman’s website should cost, and the general principles are in the main guide.
Questions people also ask
Which UK lead platforms charge per lead?
Rated People and MyBuilder work on paying for contact with a customer — Rated People by buying the ability to quote on posted jobs, MyBuilder by paying when a customer shortlists you. Checkatrade is usually described as a membership, but members reported different structures during 2026, some including charges per customer contact — so ask what your total monthly outlay covers before signing anything.
Is a website cheaper than paid leads?
Over time, usually, and the enquiry is exclusively yours. A platform fee recurs whether or not jobs arrive; a website has a fixed build cost and a care plan, and every enquiry it produces belongs to one firm. In the first months of a brand-new site, the platform usually produces enquiries faster.
Can I run both a website and a lead platform?
Yes, and many firms do: the platform fills gaps while the owned channel builds. The mistake is running platforms indefinitely without tracking which source actually clears its cost.
